Gabbard Says ‘Russiagate’ Whistleblowers Lining Up To Speak Out

Gabbard Says ‘Russiagate’ Whistleblowers Lining Up To Speak Out

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced on Sunday that whistleblowers have begun to come forward following the publication of documents and a memo that expose the Obama administration’s attempts to undermine President Donald Trump after the 2016 election.

On Friday, Gabbard made public these documents and a memo that she described as detailing a “years-long coup” against Trump following his victory over former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She portrayed the whistleblowers as individuals who are “disgusted” by the alleged “treasonous conspiracy” that was reportedly orchestrated by then-President Barack Obama in reaction to Clinton’s defeat, as noted by the Daily Caller.

“We have whistleblowers … coming forward now, after we released these documents because there are people who were around, who were working within the intelligence community who are so disgusted by what happened, we’re starting to see some of them come out of the woodwork here because they, too, like you and I and the American people, want to see justice delivered,” Gabbard stated during her appearance on “Sunday Morning Futures” with host Maria Bartiromo.

“So we’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” she added.

Gabbard then revealed a significant assertion regarding what she believes should occur next.

“There must be indictments. Those responsible, regardless of their power or position at that time, no matter who was involved in orchestrating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people, they all must be held accountable,” Gabbard emphasized.

WATCH:

Special Counsel John Durham obtained a guilty plea from Kevin Clinesmith in 2020 on charges related to the falsification of information in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications that targeted Carter Page during the FBI’s surveillance of individuals associated with Trump’s 2016 campaign.

Gabbard raised concerns about why Durham, who was assigned to investigate the origins of the FBI’s surveillance of the Trump campaign, did not manage to find these documents or “connect the dots.”

“This matter holds such historic significance that it cannot be attributed to just one, two, or three individuals. You have clearly outlined the implications and consequences of what transpired, and I believe you are effectively illustrating what we mean when we discuss the deep state,” Gabbard stated to Bartiromo.

“The reach of this issue is extensive. These individuals are determined to undermine the will of the American populace and ultimately place themselves above our democracy, which is why it is crucial that we persist on this path and remain highly focused,” she continued.

“I share the same concerns that you are expressing here. I am uncertain how it is – indeed, I have assigned my team to this matter, and we have been working on it for the past few months. I have held the position of director of National Intelligence for nearly six months now,” Gabbard remarked. “I cannot comprehend the rationale for those who allegedly investigated this matter before, whether it was Durham or others, that they were unable to connect the dots and ultimately reveal the truth to the American public.”

On May 15, 2023, Durham published a report that scrutinized the origins of the FBI’s investigation into claims that Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russia. The report determined that the FBI “did not and could not corroborate” the allegations found in the now-debunked Steele Dossier, which had been utilized to secure warrants for monitoring the communications of Page and other Trump associates.

Previous reports indicated that the dossier was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign.

They consented to pay a $113,000 fine in March 2022 “to resolve a Federal Election Commission inquiry into whether they breached campaign finance laws by misreporting expenditures on research.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *