In a major development, twenty CIA and FBI agents have come forward with allegations that former President Barack Obama and former CIA Director John Brennan orchestrated a massive deception involving the Russia investigation.
The whistleblowers claim that intelligence was manipulated to falsely suggest Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
They assert that the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) released in January 2017 was based on unreliable sources, including the discredited Steele dossier.
The agents further allege that Brennan and other senior officials suppressed dissenting views that contradicted the narrative of Russian interference to benefit Donald Trump.
Documents declassified by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have supported these claims, suggesting a coordinated effort to undermine Trump’s presidency.
In response, Attorney General Pam Bondi has formed a “strike force” to investigate the allegations of misconduct by Obama-era officials.
Republican lawmakers are calling for the appointment of a special counsel to further investigate the matter.
However, legal experts have pointed out that prosecuting former presidents presents significant constitutional challenges.
These revelations have reignited partisan debates over the origins of the Russia investigation and the handling of its intelligence.
As the investigation moves forward, the impact on public trust in the intelligence community and the political landscape remains uncertain. 
In a major development, twenty CIA and FBI agents have come forward with allegations that former President Barack Obama and former CIA Director John Brennan orchestrated a massive deception involving the Russia investigation.
